bestonlinecasinovideopoker| A man was charged for refusing to pay for the auction of counterfeit goods, and the auction company had promised to preserve the collection

2024-05-23

Last Augustbestonlinecasinovideopoker, Mr. Zhang is in Zhao, General Manager of Shengshi Dongfang International Auction Co., Ltd. in ShijiazhuangbestonlinecasinovideopokerAt the invitation of, I participated in an art auction. Before the auction, Mr. Zhang expressed concern about the authenticity of the collection. Zhao promised that the collection would be true and agreed that Mr. Zhang would pay the payment after it was identified as the authentic product.

After the auction, Mr. Zhang found that six of the paintings were imitations or fakes when identifying the collection. Mr. Zhang immediately asked for the items to be returned and refused to pay the auction price. However, Shengshi Oriental Company did not agree to this and sued Mr. Zhang to court.

On March 18 this year, the People's Court of Yuhua District, Shijiazhuang City issued a judgment on the case. The court held that Mr. Zhang failed to reasonably review Zhao's promise of "fidelity" and that the promise conflicted with the exemption clause in the Auction Rules. According to the Auction Law of the People's Republic of China and the Auction Rules, the auction company does not bear liability for defects guarantee. Therefore, Mr. Zhang was sentenced to pay the auction price, commission of 2.38 million yuan and other expenses.

Mr. Zhang refused to accept the first-instance judgment and had filed an appeal to the court. At present, the case is still under further trial, and the outcome of Mr. Zhang's appeal is not yet known.

bestonlinecasinovideopoker| A man was charged for refusing to pay for the auction of counterfeit goods, and the auction company had promised to preserve the collection

The incident sparked widespread discussions about the art auction industry's commitment to fidelity and the protection of consumer rights. In the art auction market, the complexity of authenticity identification and the constraints of auction rules pose considerable challenges to consumers. Mr. Zhang's case reminds all consumers participating in art auctions that they need to be more cautious about every commitment and rule in the auction process. At the same time, it also calls on the auction industry to strengthen the control of the authenticity of collections to safeguard market fairness and the legitimate rights and interests of consumers.